Law Offices of George Kita
Facebook Google Plus Linked In Twitter
HomeAttorney ProfileWhy Hire An AttorneyCase ResultsContact Us
Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney
Let us review your case. Contact us today to discuss your legal matter.
We’ve helped many clients with their criminal cases. Read their stories here.
Find criminal defense information in our video center.
Criminal Defense
Airport Arrests Citations
Domestic Violence
Drug Charges
DUI Defense
Failure to Appear
Hit & Run
Internet Crimes
Local Code Violations
Probation Violations
Sex Crimes
Suspended License
Theft Crimes
Traffic Infractions
Violent Crimes
Weapons Charges
Contact Us
Tell Us About Your Case:
Los Angeles
San Fernando Valley
Theft Crimes

Penal Code 288(a) & 647.6 Defense

If you or a loved one is accused of a offense enumerated in California Penal Code section 288(a), 647.6 or 314, call our office immediately for a free consultation.

Because of public policy, as well as potential safety concerns, sex cases tend to move quickly, & focus on the perspective of the reporting party.

Therefore, it can be extremely important for your attorney to promptly provide defenses and/or exculpatory evidence on your behalf, so the District Attorney has a balanced perspective of the case.

George Kita has handled many sex crime cases. His background at law enforcement and prosecution agencies provides clients a thorough understanding of the investigation process, and can prevent them from making critical mistakes during the investigation.

Are you facing a sex crime case? Don't try to resolve this on your own. Call Mr. Kita, and learn suitable strategies for you, at 213-400-5355.

Los Angeles Sex Crime Investigation Process

Sex crime cases include a wide variety of allegations: sexual assault or battery, indecent exposure, sex crimes against children, internet crimes, solicitation, as well as prostitution violations, to name a few.

And many allegations of these types trigger extraordinary responses because of safety concerns, as well as fear of prosecution for not making a police report (based on mandatory reporting statutes).

Any sex crime allegation is serious and requires immediate legal representation.

Sex cases often receive extensive publicity, and are robustly pursued in Los Angeles County. In fact, in cases where child abuse is suspected, there is criminal liability if you are subject to Mandatory Reporting Laws & fail to promptly report it.

Thus, police investigations are oftentimes set in motion, by a teacher or principal initiating contact with police, even in marginal cases.

Recently, the legislature added athletic coaches, computer technicians, and photograph processors to the list of persons who must make a report if they suspect abuse of a child, including sexual misconduct.

False Allegations of Sex Crimes

An even scarier scenario involves false allegations stemming from child custody disputes, visitation disagreements, or other personal disputes.

Even if an allegation is without a reasonable factual basis, there are significant repercussions which may stem from this, including loss of employment, modification of custody/visits with your own kids, public embarrassment, as well as substantial costs to fight the false charges. Once a person is publicly accused, the challenges can be daunting.

In my experience with the justice system for more than 20 years, I think it is extremely important for sex cases to be processed systematically.

Rather than police quickly jumping to conclusions about a case, with public statements and assumptions, caution should be the primary consideration from the start.

Once the proverbial bell is rung in sex crime cases, the damage is done, even if the allegations turn out to be mistaken.

If I didn’t do anything wrong, why do I need an attorney?

The short answer is that if you attempt to represent yourself and make an incomplete or inappropriate statements, you may cause an investigation to be built against you.

If I have a client facing a sex charge, I am the buffer between the client and police. I often initiate contact with the investigating detective. This is especially true if my client is facing a false allegation.

At the early stages of the investigation, I may need to quickly provide evidence which corroborates my client’s innocence, rather than allow him or her to face the onslaught of negative public outrage. These cases tend to develop quickly, and it is important for a lawyer to be ready to respond to each stage of the investigation.

In all cases where my clients are facing accusations of this nature, I want to emphasize to police to proceed with care. I also want to be informed at each stage of the investigation, whenever possible. However, I will not allow any police interview of my clients unless or until I am comfortable with the state of the investigation.

Sex Crime Cases in Los Angeles

Each step of the Los Angeles sex crime investigation should be discreetly and carefully made. Once any immediate safety concerns are addressed by law enforcement, police investigators should cautiously proceed, interviewing possible witnesses or involved parties.

This initial investigation should attempt to bring to light any bias, motive, or similar issue which would tend to suggest that the allegations were not substantiated. In my experience, it bolsters the veracity of an investigation to evaluate the important details prior to speaking to the news media about sex crimes.

Once the investigation is complete by police, a sex crimes lawyer may want to address specific issues with the detective, which could be helpful to their client. The detective will usually have an opinion about the veracity of the case at this time.

This opinion will usually be taken into account by the LA District Attorney’s Office when deciding whether to file or reject charges in the case.

Thus, it is also important for a lawyer to keep a line of communication open with the DA’s Office, which could promote a helpful dialog during this decision-making process. It is also important to explore the issue of bail, and make arrangements for that contingency if it is a possibility.

If the case is rejected for filing, the legal representation may have saved the client from irreversible personal harm, as well as harm to family and friends of the accused.

If a sex case is filed, an effective attorney will explore all viable defenses, engage a private investigator to assist with an independent investigation, and prepare the client for court and trial. Sometimes, a good working relationship with the government agencies will allow the client to be processed in a less public and intrusive manner, minimizing negative collateral consequences.

The stakes are high, and your lawyer’s efforts will be extensive, because depending on the sex charge, a sentence may involve jail or prison, as well as PC 290 Registration.

Penal Code section 290 Registration

If the client has the opportunity to resolve a sex case at court, an initial concern will be whether the client would be required to register as a sex-offender pursuant to Penal Code section 290.

Because of the extraordinary harmful consequences of this requirement in many sex cases, I carefully review the options for any plea offer with the client, keeping in mind that the 290 requirement means lifetime registration as a sex offender.

Because of the significant consequences of these cases, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the potential consequences of a plea agreement, as well as the dangers and/or advantages of going to trial.

Penal Code 288(a) Court Victories (partial list)


A 50 year old father from El Monte, California was falsely accused of child molestation against his step daughter. He was facing exposure of 16 years in state prison as well as sex offender registration for life. Mr. Kita was able to get crucial evidence presented to the investigating Detective on the case and was able to get the case thrown out.


Client a high school teacher in the Long Beach Unified School District was falsely accused of sexual molestation of two high school students. The prosecutor filed 17 felony counts of child molestation. The case went to jury trial and all 17 felony counts were dismissed at jury trial.


Client a college student was falsely accused of raping, sodomizing and oral copulating a woman in Los Angeles. He was facing 35 years in state prison. Mr. Kita won a series of pretrial motions including getting the clients coerced false confessions thrown out. Mr. Kita was able to show that the accuser had an ulerior motive with a history of violence and lies. The case went to jury trial and on the third day of jury trial all sex charges were dismissed. Clien served zero days in jail.


Client was a college student who had dinner with a woman who was a college professor where the student attended College. The two had consumed drinks together at a popular Pub and had a consensual sex at the student's apartment. The woman later claimed to police that the client had forcibly raped her. Mr. Kita was able to show that the complaining party had mental health issues and had lied about their sexual encounter. The case was dismissed.


Client was charged with sodomizing his mentally retarded uncle. The complaining party claimed that client forced him to dress up in a woman's night gown then forcibly sodomized him repeatedly. Mr. Kita was able to present medical records of the complaining party from UCLA Harbor Medical that showed that the witness had suffered from sexual delusions with a past documented history of having delusions of participating in orgies and having a sexual fetish of dressing up in woman's clothing and had a history of crawling under desks to stare up a woman's dress. After presenting this information to the LA County District Attorney's Office, the case was dismissed. The client was granted his freedom after serving 11 days in custody.


Client a teacher with the LA Unified School District was falsely accused of molesting his fiancee's daughter. Mr. Kita was able to get statements from the girls mother and father who were divorced at the time and both stated the daughter had a history of lying. Mr. Kita was able to present the girls personal diary which failed to contain any entries about the allged sexual encounter with client. Finally Mr. Kita was able to present the students school attendance and disciplinary record which showed the complaing parties true character. The attendance record showed the student failed to attend school for 30 days in which she falsely claimed to her mother she was at school as well as a disciplinary record for stealing a lunch card from a fellow student's locker.


Client was accused of attempted child molestation. Client reportedy exposed himself and asked the alleged victim to lick his private part. Client was aquitted of all charges.


More than a dozen federal agents from the United States Homeland & Security and Immigration & Cusorms Enforcement office raided clients home and arrested him for allegely possessing child porn and downloading child porn. The case was resolved with no criminal indictment issued by the United States Attoney's Office. Mr. Kita was able to get property seized (computers, laptops etc.) returned back to client.

Learn options for your case. Call George Kita, today, at 213-400-5355!

*Disclaimer - Results in sex crime allegations depend on particular details/applicable law of each case.